Alert:
Whamply does not offer any jobs via WhatsApp — Stay safe & be careful of fraud 4.8/5 rating on Trust Pilot 🔥 Get a Free SEO Audit — Limited slots available this month! 🚀 5 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐rating on Good Firms across India & globally AI-Powered Marketing solutions now available — Book a free consultation Whamply does not offer any jobs via WhatsApp — Stay safe & be careful of fraud 🔥 Get a Free SEO Audit — Limited slots available this month! 🚀 Trusted by 500+ brands across India & globally AI-Powered Marketing solutions now available — Book a free consultation
Alert:
Whamply does not offer jobs via WhatsApp — Stay safe! 🚀 5 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐rating on Good Firms across India & globally 🔥 Free SEO Audit — Limited slots this month! 🚀 Trusted by 500+ brands — Results-driven marketing Whamply does not offer jobs via WhatsApp — Stay safe! 🔥 Free SEO Audit — Limited slots this month! 🚀 Trusted by 500+ brands — Results-driven marketing
◆ All Services
Search Engine Optimization
Dominate search rankings with data-driven SEO strategies — local to global
Performance Marketing
ROI-driven paid campaigns across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, Amazon & more
YouTube Marketing
Full-service YouTube — channel strategy, video production, SEO & growth
Content Marketing
Strategic content that ranks on Google and converts readers into customers
Branding & Creative
Complete visual identity — logo, guidelines, packaging, motion graphics & more
Email Marketing
Automated sequences & campaigns that nurture leads and generate repeat revenue
Online Reputation Management
Protect & strengthen your brand — reviews, monitoring & crisis response
Get Free Audit Get Started →
ASO Services · iOS & Google Play

ASO Services That Turn Store Impressions Into Real Installs

Whamply is an App Store Optimization agency for publishers who are tired of paying for every install. We optimise iOS and Android listings separately — because the two stores index completely different fields — then test the creative that actually wins the tap. Free ASO audit, delivered in 48 hours.

App Store
Google Play
4.9/5 rated agency
Get In Touch With Us
~65%
of app installs still begin with a store search
Industry app-discovery studies
100
characters in the hidden iOS keyword field
Apple App Store Connect
0
keyword fields on Google Play — it reads the description
Google Play Console
3–6s
a user spends deciding whether to install
App store UX research

Figures reviewed August 2026. Store field limits are current as of this date — Apple and Google change them without announcement.

The Short Version

What Is App Store Optimization?

ASO services are how an app earns installs it did not have to buy. Here is the short definition — and the single most important thing most publishers get wrong.

Quick answer

App Store Optimization (ASO) is the practice of improving a mobile app so it ranks higher in App Store and Google Play search and converts more of the people who see it into installs. ASO has two halves: visibility, driven by keyword placement in the fields each store actually indexes, and conversion, driven by icon, screenshots, video, ratings and reviews. The two stores index completely different fields, so a single listing written for both underperforms on both.

What the App Store indexes

Apple gives you a hidden 100-character keyword field and ignores your description entirely for search:

  • App name — 30 characters, indexed, highest weight
  • Subtitle — 30 characters, indexed, second highest weight
  • Keyword field — 100 characters, indexed, invisible to users
  • Developer name — indexed
  • In-app purchase names — indexed
  • Description — NOT indexed for search
  • Ratings, reviews and download velocity — ranking inputs

What Google Play indexes

Google has no keyword field at all and reads your full long description instead:

  • App title — 30 characters, indexed, highest weight
  • Short description — 80 characters, indexed
  • Long description — 4,000 characters, fully indexed
  • Developer name — indexed
  • No separate keyword field exists
  • Install volume, retention and uninstall rate — ranking inputs
  • Ratings, reviews and crash rate — ranking inputs

This is why one listing pasted into both stores underperforms on both — it wastes Apple's keyword field and starves Google Play of the text it actually reads.

What's Included

Drive App Growth With Targeted App Store Optimization Services

Eight workstreams covering visibility and conversion on both stores. Boost installs, ratings and retention with ASO services built around how each store actually ranks apps.

ASO Strategy & Roadmap
A store-by-store plan covering keyword targets, category selection, creative direction and a test calendar — sequenced by expected impact rather than by what is quickest to ship.
Learn more →
App Keyword Research
Search terms mapped to Apple's title, subtitle and keyword field, and to Google Play's short and long descriptions, using Search Ads volume data rather than guesswork.
Learn more →
Store Listing & ASO Content
Titles, subtitles, descriptions and What's New copy written per store and per locale, carrying keywords where they are indexed and persuasion where users actually read.
Learn more →
Creative & Conversion Assets
Icon, screenshot sets and preview video designed to win the tap in search results — where most install decisions are made before the product page ever loads.
Learn more →
A/B Testing & CRO
Structured experiments through Apple Product Page Optimization and Google Play store listing experiments, run to significance and documented so results compound.
Learn more →
Ratings & Review Management
In-app prompt timing, review response workflows and sentiment tracking — the signals that move both store ranking and the install decision.
Learn more →
Paid
Apple Search Ads & UAC
Paid app campaigns run alongside organic, feeding real keyword volume back into the ASO strategy instead of operating as a separate budget line.
Learn more →
ASO Analytics & Reporting
Keyword rank tracking per store and locale, impression-to-install conversion, category rank and retention — reported monthly against the baseline we set in week one.
Learn more →

Why Rely on Whamply for App Store Optimization Services?

As an ASO agency working across both stores every day, we know where the leverage actually sits — and where most App Store Optimization companies quietly stop. Here is what you get that a generic ASO package does not include.

Explore how we work

Dedicated app growth manager

One named person owns your ASO engagement end to end — keyword strategy, creative briefs, test scheduling and reporting. No rotating account handlers, no ticket queues, and no situation where the person on your monthly call has never opened your store listing.

01 / 08
How We Work

How Our ASO Services Run, Stage by Stage

Six stages with honest timelines. You will know what is happening each month — including the early stretch where the work is research and nothing visible has shipped yet.

  1. Baseline Week 1–2

    ASO audit & competitor teardown

    We score your current listings on both stores, pull your keyword rankings and conversion rate, and tear down the apps outranking you — what they target, how they present, what they changed recently. You get the baseline in writing before anything is edited.

  2. Mapping Week 2–3

    Keyword research & field mapping

    Search terms researched against real volume data, then mapped separately to Apple's title, subtitle and keyword field and to Google Play's short and long descriptions. Category selection is reviewed at the same time — it is a ranking decision, not an admin one.

  3. Listing Week 3–5

    Store listing rewrite

    Titles, subtitles and descriptions rewritten per store, with priority locales handled as separate indexes rather than translations. Submitted and monitored through review, since a rejection costs a release cycle.

  4. Creative Week 4–8

    Icon, screenshots & preview video

    New creative built for the search result view first — icon and first two screenshots — then the full product page. Every asset is produced as a testable variant rather than a single final version.

  5. Testing Month 2–6

    A/B testing & iteration

    Native store experiments run monthly to statistical significance, one variable at a time, with results documented so the next test builds on the last instead of restarting the argument.

  6. Compounding Ongoing

    Ratings, monitoring & expansion

    Review response and prompt tuning, rank monitoring across stores and locales, defence when a competitor moves on your terms, and expansion into new markets once the core listing is converting.

Client Reviews

What Happened After We Took Over Their App Listings

Fintech, health, education, commerce and logistics apps — the same ASO process, calibrated per category. Read all client testimonials.

GoodFirms
We had one description pasted across both stores and no idea Apple even had a keyword field. Whamply rebuilt the listings separately and our App Store keyword coverage went from a handful of terms to over two hundred within three months.
Google
The icon test alone lifted our install conversion by a third. We had redesigned it twice before on instinct and never measured anything. Running proper store experiments changed how we make every creative decision now.
Clutch
They treated Apple Search Ads as research rather than just a budget line, which nobody else we spoke to suggested. Our organic keyword strategy is now built on real volume data instead of tool estimates.
Google
Our shopping app was buried. Whamply reworked the category choice, the subtitle and the first three screenshots, and we moved into the top fifty in our category in about four months without any paid push.
Google
Localising properly for four Indian languages instead of machine-translating everything doubled our installs from outside metro cities. That recommendation alone paid for the engagement.
Clutch
Our rating was stuck at 3.9 and dragging everything down. The in-app prompt timing and review response workflow they set up got us to 4.6 in five months, and installs followed without any other change.
Google
Our patient app now gets recommended when people ask AI assistants for clinic booking apps in our region. That was not something we knew was possible, let alone something we were optimising for.
Clutch
Reporting on impression-to-install conversion rather than impressions was the change that made ASO legible to our board. We could finally show what the work was doing in numbers that mattered.
Drag or swipe to see more →
Key takeaways
  • The App Store and Google Play index different fields. Apple reads title, subtitle and a hidden 100-character keyword field; Google Play reads your full description. One listing written for both loses on both.
  • ASO is half visibility and half conversion. Ranking for a term you convert at 2% is worth less than ranking lower for one you convert at 12%.
  • Your icon and first two screenshots do most of the conversion work, because they are what appears in search results before anyone taps through.
  • Both stores have free native A/B testing — Apple Product Page Optimization and Google Play store listing experiments. Most apps never switch them on.
  • Ratings and reviews affect both ranking and install rate. Prompt at the right moment in-app rather than asking everyone at launch.
  • ASO services in India run Rs 20,000 to Rs 1,20,000 per month. Below that band, nobody is doing localisation or creative testing.

Why ASO Services Decide Whether an App Grows

Most apps do not fail because the product is bad. They fail because nobody finds them, and the ones who do find them scroll past. Store search remains the largest single source of app discovery, and it is the only channel where an install costs you nothing incremental. Every other route — paid social, search ads, influencer pushes — stops producing the day the budget stops. A well-optimised listing keeps converting for as long as the app exists.

That is the commercial case for App Store Optimization services, and it has an uncomfortable corollary: if your listing converts poorly, you are also overpaying for every paid install, because paid traffic lands on the same product page organic traffic does. Publishers often discover that their cost per install was never really an ad problem. It was a listing problem being paid for twice.

The mechanics differ enough from web search that experience does not transfer cleanly. There are no backlinks. There are hard character limits. Install velocity and retention feed ranking directly, which means product quality is a ranking factor in a way it never quite is on the web. And crucially, the two stores work differently enough that treating them as one channel is the most common and most expensive mistake in ASO. If you want the web-side equivalent first, our SEO fundamentals guide covers that ground.

Written by the Whamply App Growth TeamIn-house ASO strategists, creative designers and paid-app specialists running store optimisation across fintech, health, education and commerce apps. Read our 7-step process or meet the team.

The two stores are not one channel

This is the single most valuable thing on this page. Apple indexes your app name, your subtitle and a hidden 100-character keyword field that users never see — and it does not index your description at all. Google Play has no keyword field whatsoever and indexes your entire 4,000-character long description. Those are not small differences in emphasis. They are opposite architectures.

The practical consequence: a description written to be keyword-rich is wasted effort on iOS, where nobody indexes it, while a short punchy description leaves Google Play with almost nothing to rank you on. Meanwhile the iOS keyword field — the highest-leverage 100 characters in mobile marketing — sits empty or stuffed with plurals and repeated words that Apple already combines automatically. We see this on the majority of apps we audit.

How the App Store and Google Play differ for ASO purposes.
 Apple App StoreGoogle Play
Title30 characters, indexed30 characters, indexed
Second fieldSubtitle, 30 chars, indexedShort description, 80 chars, indexed
Keyword field100 chars, hidden, indexedNone — does not exist
DescriptionNot indexed for search4,000 chars, fully indexed
A/B testingProduct Page OptimizationStore listing experiments
Quality signalsRatings, reviews, velocityRatings, retention, crash and ANR rate

Keyword research for apps is a different job

App keyword research starts from how users describe their problem, not how you describe your product. Someone looking for an expense tracker searches "track spending", "budget app", "money manager" — rarely the feature names on your roadmap. Volume validation matters, and here Apple Search Ads is genuinely privileged infrastructure: it is the only source of true App Store search volume, which is why we treat it as research even for clients who spend nothing on it.

Prioritise mid-tail and long-tail terms. A new app will not rank for "fitness" and chasing it burns months. It can realistically rank for "home workout no equipment", and that searcher converts far better because their intent is specific. Sustainable ASO growth is the accumulation of hundreds of long-tail rankings rather than one head-term victory. Both stores also combine words across fields into phrase permutations, so a well-constructed listing ranks for far more than it explicitly targets — which is exactly why repeating a word across your title, subtitle and keyword field wastes characters you cannot spare. Our AI-assisted keyword research speeds up the discovery stage without replacing volume validation.

Conversion is half the discipline, and the cheaper half

Ranking gets you seen. Conversion decides whether being seen matters. If your listing converts at 3% and a competitor's converts at 9%, they get three times your installs from identical visibility — and their higher install velocity then pushes them above you in ranking too. Conversion compounds into visibility, which is why we treat it as the first lever rather than the finishing touch.

The assets that matter most are the ones visible before anyone taps: your icon and your first two or three screenshots, which appear directly in search results. Icons need to be legible at thumbnail size and distinct from category conventions — an icon test routinely produces the largest single conversion gain available. Screenshots should lead with the strongest benefit rather than walking through features, with caption text readable on a phone held at arm's length. Preview video helps for apps whose value is hard to convey statically, and hurts for some simple utilities, which is precisely why it belongs in a test rather than an assumption. Creative production runs through our visual identity and motion graphics teams.

Both stores give you free A/B testing. Almost nobody uses it

Apple Product Page Optimization and Google Play store listing experiments are native, free, split traffic properly and report statistical significance. They are the most underused tools in mobile marketing. Most apps still redesign their listing once a year based on whoever argued hardest in the meeting, then attribute whatever happens next to the change.

Run tests one variable at a time. Run them to significance rather than stopping when an early number looks good — small samples routinely reverse. Document results so the next test builds on the last instead of relitigating the same debate. Over a year, a monthly test cadence produces a listing nobody could have designed upfront, and the compounding is the entire point. This is the same discipline as web conversion rate optimisation, applied to a surface with far less traffic noise.

Ratings move ranking and conversion at the same time

Rating average, volume and recency all feed store ranking, and they affect install rate even more strongly. The gap between a 3.8 and a 4.6 app is enormous in conversion terms, which makes rating improvement one of the fastest available levers on total installs — often faster than any keyword work.

The method that works is unglamorous: prompt inside the app at genuine moments of success using the native rating APIs, never during onboarding and never after an error. Respond to negative reviews publicly and specifically, because users frequently update their rating after a helpful reply — one of the few ways to improve historical ratings rather than only future ones. Never incentivise, never gate by sentiment, never buy. Purchased reviews get detected, removed in bulk, and put the listing itself at risk. Where sentiment needs broader repair, our reputation management and sentiment analysis services run alongside.

Localisation multiplies your indexed surface

Each store locale is a separate index with its own title, subtitle and keyword field. Localising properly does not just translate your listing — it gives you an entirely new set of indexed characters targeting how people actually search in that market. For apps with real international demand, this is often the largest untapped visibility gain available.

The failure mode is machine-translating into thirty locales at once. That dilutes quality everywhere without adding meaningful visibility anywhere, and awkward translations damage conversion in exactly the markets you were trying to enter. Pick the locales that carry genuine download volume for your category and do those properly. India alone can justify several language listings before you look outward. The same logic drives our global SEO work on the web side.

Apple Search Ads and Google App Campaigns are usually run by a different team from ASO, and that separation costs both. Paid data tells you which keywords actually convert before you commit organic effort. Paid installs contribute to the velocity that feeds organic ranking, so a targeted push can lift organic position on a term you care about. And organic listing quality determines the conversion rate of every paid tap you buy.

We run app promotion campaigns alongside ASO for exactly this reason, with remarketing handling re-engagement. Treated as one plan, the two channels feed each other. Treated separately, they duplicate research and contradict each other on positioning.

A new surface: assistants recommending apps

Something genuinely new is happening in app discovery. People increasingly ask ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity which app to use for a task, and those answers are not assembled from store listings — they come from the open web, from reviews, comparison articles, forums and your own site. An app with no web presence is invisible in that conversation regardless of how well its listing is optimised.

This makes web presence part of app discovery for the first time. A proper landing page, consistent naming and feature descriptions everywhere your app appears, coverage in publications your category reads, and reviews that agree across sources are what let a model name your app with confidence. It is the same entity work our AI SEO and ChatGPT SEO services do for brands, applied to apps — and almost no App Store Optimization company is doing it yet.

Which apps get the most from ASO services

Every app benefits, but the return varies sharply by category. Fintech and health apps face high paid acquisition costs and strict ad restrictions, which makes organic store visibility disproportionately valuable — often the only channel where unit economics work at all. Education apps see heavy seasonal search spikes around admissions and exam cycles, so ASO services have to lead demand by a quarter rather than react to it.

Commerce and food delivery apps compete on brand recall more than discovery, so conversion work and ratings usually outperform keyword expansion. Travel apps live or die on localisation, since the searcher is frequently in a different market from the business. B2B SaaS companion apps are the exception where the web does most of the work and the store listing mainly needs to convert people already sent there — which is why we scope App Store Optimization services per category rather than selling one package. See all industries we serve.

What should ASO services cost?

ASO services in India run roughly Rs 20,000 to Rs 1,20,000 per month, driven by store count, locale count and category competitiveness. Creative production is usually the largest variable — an agency shipping monthly screenshot and video variants carries real production cost that a keyword-only retainer does not. Anything materially below that band is doing keyword edits and calling it ASO. Full plans sit on our pricing page.

Indicative Whamply ASO plans. Final scope follows the free ASO audit.
PlanFromBest forIncludes
ASO Starter Rs 25,000/mo One store, one locale, new or small app ASO audit, keyword mapping, listing rewrite, icon and screenshot refresh, monthly reporting
ASO Growth Rs 55,000/mo Both stores, competitive category Starter for iOS and Android, monthly A/B tests, preview video, ratings programme, 3 locales
App Scale Rs 1,20,000+/mo Multi-market apps and app portfolios Per-locale strategy, Apple Search Ads management, creative production, dedicated growth manager

Six mistakes that keep apps invisible

  • One listing pasted into both stores. Wastes Apple's keyword field, starves Google Play of indexable text.
  • An empty or repetitive keyword field. The highest-leverage 100 characters in mobile marketing, routinely left half-used.
  • Screenshots designed for the product page. The first two appear in search results, where the decision is actually made.
  • Never running a store experiment. Free, native, statistically valid, and ignored by most publishers.
  • Asking for ratings on first launch. Prompts spent before the user has experienced anything worth rating.
  • Machine-translating into thirty locales. Dilutes quality everywhere, converts nowhere.

How to tell whether ASO is working

Judge the campaign on install volume, impression-to-install conversion rate, keyword rank on terms carrying real intent, category rank, and day-one and day-seven retention. Store impressions on their own are the trap — they rise easily with broad low-intent visibility that never converts, and they make a stalled campaign look healthy on a slide.

Segment before concluding anything. Branded searches convert far higher than category searches, so a single blended conversion number hides the thing you actually need to know. Track per store and per locale, since the same keyword ranks differently on iOS and Android in the same country, often by a wide margin. And watch retention alongside installs: over-promising creative buys installs that churn, and churn suppresses the visibility that produced them. Competitor movement is worth monitoring on the same cadence, which is where AI competitor analysis saves time.

About Whamply Media, an ASO agency built for both stores

Founded in 2021 and headquartered in New Delhi, Whamply Media has delivered growth marketing to 500+ brands across 15+ industries in India, the US, the UK, Australia and the Gulf. Our ASO services combine keyword strategy, store listing copywriting, creative production, native A/B testing, ratings management and paid app campaigns under one roof — alongside SEO services, performance marketing and branding and creative. Start with a free ASO audit, delivered within 48 hours, or book a consultation to talk it through first.

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions About ASO Services

Sourced from what app publishers actually search when researching App Store Optimization services. Answered directly, in the first sentence. Scroll for the full list.

App Store Optimization is the practice of improving a mobile app so it ranks higher in App Store and Google Play search and converts more of the people who see it into installs. It covers keyword placement in the fields each store indexes, plus the icon, screenshots, video, ratings and reviews that drive the install decision.

ASO services cover app keyword research, store listing copywriting per store and locale, icon and screenshot creative, preview video, A/B testing, ratings and review management, category selection and rank reporting. Whamply ASO services also include Apple Search Ads management, because it is the only reliable source of true App Store keyword volume.

An ASO agency researches which terms your users search, places them in the specific fields each store indexes, rebuilds your creative to win the tap in search results, tests variants natively, and manages ratings. The good ones report on install conversion rate rather than store impressions, which are easy to inflate and mean little.

SEO improves website visibility in search engines; ASO improves app visibility inside app stores. The mechanics differ substantially — app stores have far fewer indexable fields, hard character limits, no backlinks, and install velocity and retention as direct ranking inputs. The strategic thinking transfers; almost none of the specific tactics do.

Yes, because store search remains the largest single source of app discovery and it is the cheapest install you will ever get. Paid acquisition costs rise every year and stop the moment budget stops. A well-optimised listing keeps converting indefinitely, and it also improves the conversion rate of every paid install you buy.

Conversion improvements from new creative can appear within two to four weeks, because they affect every impression immediately. Keyword rank movement typically takes six to twelve weeks as the stores gather install signal against your new terms. Competitive categories such as finance and gaming need four to six months of sustained work.

More than ever, because paid traffic lands on the same store listing organic traffic does. A weak listing means you pay for the tap and lose the install, inflating cost per install across every campaign. ASO improves paid efficiency and organic volume simultaneously, which is why we run both together.

A scored review of both store listings, current keyword rankings and coverage, impression-to-install conversion against category benchmarks, creative assessment against search-result presentation, ratings profile and velocity, category selection, competitor keyword gaps, and localisation coverage. Ours is delivered in 48 hours with a prioritised fix list.

They index completely different fields. Apple indexes your app name, subtitle and a hidden 100-character keyword field, and does not index your description at all. Google Play has no keyword field and indexes your full long description. A single listing written for both wastes Apple's keyword field and starves Google Play of indexable text.

It is a 100-character field in App Store Connect that users never see but Apple indexes for search. Use it for terms not already in your app name or subtitle, comma-separated with no spaces, no plurals and no repetition — Apple combines words across fields automatically, so repeating a term wastes characters you cannot spare.

Yes, the full long description is indexed, which makes it the single most important text field on Google Play. Write it for readability with your target terms placed naturally and repeated at a sensible density. Keyword-stuffed descriptions read badly to users and risk policy issues, so the ceiling is lower than it looks.

It carries the highest keyword weight on both stores and is limited to 30 characters each. That constraint forces a real trade-off between brand name and search terms. For an unknown app, a descriptive term usually earns more installs than the brand alone; for an established one, the brand is the asset.

The subtitle is a 30-character indexed field sitting under your app name, carrying the second-highest keyword weight on the App Store. It should extend the title rather than repeat it, adding a distinct high-value term while still reading as a coherent value statement to a human scanning results.

Substantially. Category determines which top charts you can appear in and influences which searches surface you. A slightly less obvious category with weaker competition often produces more visibility than the crowded one everyone defaults to. It is a ranking decision, and it should be revisited rather than set once at launch.

They let you show different creative and copy to different audiences — Apple calls them Custom Product Pages, Google calls them Custom Store Listings. Pair each with a specific campaign or audience segment so paid traffic lands on messaging matching the ad that brought them. Most apps never set them up.

Yes, indirectly and consistently. Regular updates signal an actively maintained app, refresh your What's New text, and give you a natural moment to adjust keywords and creative. Apps left unupdated for long stretches tend to drift down in rankings even when nothing else changes.

Start with the markets that carry real download volume for your category rather than translating into every available language. Each locale is a separate index with its own keyword field, so proper localisation multiplies your indexed surface. Machine translation into thirty locales dilutes quality without adding meaningful visibility anywhere.

Start from how users describe the problem rather than how you describe the product, then validate volume — Apple Search Ads is the only source of true App Store search volume. Score terms on relevance, volume and difficulty, and prioritise mid-tail terms where a smaller app can realistically rank rather than head terms it cannot.

More than the fields suggest, because both stores combine words across fields into new phrase permutations. A well-constructed listing with strong install signal typically ranks for hundreds of long-tail variants it never explicitly targeted. That combinatorial effect is why avoiding repetition across fields matters so much.

It is technically possible and widely done, but returns are usually poor and it can attract policy attention. Users searching a competitor by name mostly want that specific app. Budget is better spent on category and problem terms where the searcher has not yet chosen, and where your positioning can actually change the outcome.

Longer, more specific search phrases with lower volume and much lower competition — "expense tracker for freelancers" rather than "expenses". They convert better because intent is clearer, and a new app can realistically rank for them. Most sustainable ASO growth comes from accumulating long-tail coverage rather than winning one head term.

Review monthly, change deliberately. Each change resets the store's learning against those terms, so constant churn prevents anything from stabilising. Change when a term has clearly failed to rank after a full cycle, when a competitor shifts, or when your own data shows a term converting poorly despite ranking well.

Yes, in two distinct ways. It is the only reliable source of true App Store keyword volume, making it research infrastructure as much as an acquisition channel. Separately, paid installs contribute to the install velocity that feeds organic ranking, so a paid push on a target term can help organic rank on it.

It is the practice of increasing the percentage of people who install after seeing your listing. The levers are icon, first screenshots, preview video, title, ratings and description opening. It matters more than ranking in isolation, because doubling conversion doubles installs from the visibility you already have, with no rank change at all.

It is the single highest-leverage creative asset, because it appears in search results, top charts and every browse surface before anyone reads a word. Icons need to be legible at very small sizes, distinct from category conventions, and consistent with your screenshots. Icon tests routinely produce the largest single conversion gains.

Use all available slots, but design the first two or three as though they are the only ones — those are what appear in search results without a tap. Lead with the strongest benefit rather than a feature tour, use readable caption text, and keep the visual language consistent with your icon.

Usually, though not always, which is exactly why it should be tested rather than assumed. Video autoplays in App Store search results and can lift conversion substantially for apps whose value is hard to convey statically. For simple utilities, a strong screenshot set sometimes outperforms video.

Use the native tools: Apple Product Page Optimization and Google Play store listing experiments. Both are free, split traffic properly and report significance. Test one variable at a time, run to significance rather than stopping at a promising early number, and document results so the next test builds on the last.

It varies widely by category and traffic source, so benchmark against your own category and your own history rather than a headline figure. Branded searches convert far higher than category searches, so an overall number hides more than it reveals. Segment by keyword type before drawing any conclusion.

Yes, disproportionately. Only the first two or three lines display before the More button, and most users never expand. Lead with the clearest statement of what the app does and who it is for. On Google Play the rest is still indexed and worth writing well; on iOS it exists purely to persuade.

Considerably, on both stores, and they affect install rate even more than ranking. Rating average, volume and recency all count. An app at 4.6 stars converts dramatically better than the same app at 3.8, which means rating improvement is often the fastest available lever on total installs.

Prompt inside the app at a genuine moment of success — after a completed task, not on first launch — using the native rating APIs both platforms provide. Never incentivise, never gate by sentiment, and never buy reviews. Purchased reviews get detected, removed in bulk, and can put the listing itself at risk.

Always, and quickly. Both stores let developers reply publicly, and a specific, non-defensive response demonstrates an actively maintained app to every future reader. Users frequently update their rating after a helpful reply, which is one of the few ways to improve historical ratings rather than only future ones.

After a moment of demonstrated value — a completed workout, a saved document, a successful transaction — and never during onboarding or immediately after an error. Both platforms cap how often the native prompt appears, so each request should be spent at the point of highest satisfaction.

Both stores allow resetting the rating on a new version, but it is rarely the right move. You lose accumulated volume, which is itself a ranking and trust signal, and if the underlying cause is unfixed the low rating returns quickly. Fix the product issue and rebuild rating through recent reviews instead.

Yes, particularly on Google Play, where technical quality metrics including crash rate and ANR rate are explicit ranking inputs. Poor stability suppresses visibility directly and drives negative reviews that suppress it again. Fixing stability is ASO work, even though it sits with engineering rather than marketing.

Install volume, impression-to-install conversion rate, keyword rank on terms that carry intent, category rank, and day-one and day-seven retention. Store impressions alone are the vanity metric — they rise with broad low-intent visibility that never converts, and they make a stalled campaign look healthy.

Use a dedicated ASO tool that polls store search across your target locales on a schedule, since neither store reports keyword rank natively. Track per store and per locale — the same keyword will rank differently on iOS and Android in the same country, often by a wide margin.

The usual causes are a listing change that removed keywords you were ranking for, a competitor targeting your terms, a rating decline, a slowdown in install velocity, or a store algorithm update. Check your own change history first — self-inflicted drops after a listing edit are by far the most common.

It is the rate of installs over a period rather than the total, and both stores weight it heavily. Steady growth signals a relevant, healthy app. This is why a paid push can lift organic rank, and why one-off spikes from a promotion rarely produce durable ranking gains.

Yes, strongly on Google Play and meaningfully on iOS. Installs followed by rapid uninstalls signal a mismatch between listing promise and product reality. This is the risk of over-promising in your creative: you buy installs that churn, and the churn suppresses the visibility that produced them.

Track their keyword coverage, rating trajectory, update cadence and creative changes over time rather than taking a single snapshot. What matters is direction — an app steadily gaining keyword coverage is a different threat from one that peaked eighteen months ago and has not shipped since.

Increasingly, yes. When someone asks an assistant which app to use for a task, the answer is assembled from the open web — reviews, comparison articles, forums and your own site — rather than from store listings. That makes web presence part of app discovery, which is a genuinely new surface for ASO.

Make the app a resolvable entity outside the store: a real website with clear structured data, consistent naming and feature descriptions everywhere it appears, coverage in publications and comparison content, and reviews that agree across sources. Our AI SEO and ChatGPT SEO services handle this layer.

Not for store ranking directly, but yes for discovery overall. App store listings rank poorly in web search, so a proper site captures search demand the store cannot, supports paid landing pages, and gives AI assistants something authoritative to retrieve when recommending apps in your category.

Yes. Google Play listings are indexed and can rank in web results, and app content can surface through app indexing. A dedicated app landing page usually outranks the store listing for branded and feature queries, so most apps benefit from optimising a site alongside the listing.

It helps. Keyword insight transfers between them, your landing pages and store listings should tell one story, and web reviews influence both app credibility and AI recommendations. Whamply runs ASO alongside SEO services for exactly this reason — split teams tend to produce contradictory positioning.

ASO services in India typically run Rs 20,000 to Rs 1,20,000 per month depending on store count, locale count and category competitiveness. Whamply ASO plans start at Rs 25,000 per month, and every engagement opens with a free ASO audit before scope is fixed. Creative production is usually the largest variable.

Ask which store fields they optimise and listen for whether they distinguish iOS from Android — vague answers mean one listing copy-pasted twice. Ask how they test creative; if the answer is not native store experiments, they are guessing. Avoid anyone guaranteeing top-chart position or offering incentivised installs.

Partly, and the early wins are genuinely accessible. Rewriting your title and subtitle, filling the keyword field properly and improving your first screenshots are all achievable in-house. Sustained keyword research, statistically valid creative testing, localisation and multi-store rank tracking are where an agency earns its fee.

Yes. Whamply works with app publishers across India, the US, the UK, Australia and the Gulf, including multi-market apps running many store locales. Each market gets its own keyword research rather than a translated version, since search behaviour differs more between locales than most publishers expect.

A defined scope with deliverable counts, named metrics reported monthly, a stated test cadence, your ownership of all creative assets produced, App Store Connect and Play Console access in your own name, and an exit clause with full data handover. Never let an agency hold your store console access.

A scored review of both store listings, your keyword coverage and rankings, impression-to-install conversion against category benchmarks, creative assessment, ratings profile, category selection, competitor gaps and localisation coverage — delivered in 48 hours with a prioritised fix list. No commitment required.

Ongoing. Competitors change their listings, stores update their algorithms, your ratings move and search behaviour shifts seasonally. A one-off optimisation produces a lift that decays over roughly six months as everything around it changes. The apps that compound are the ones testing continuously.
Scroll for more — 54 questions Still stuck? Talk to an ASO expert →
Explore More

ASO Works Best Alongside These

Limited ASO audit slots this month

Stop Paying for Installs You Should Be Earning

A free ASO audit covering both store listings, keyword coverage, conversion rate against category benchmarks, creative and ratings — scored, prioritised and delivered in 48 hours.

Are You Ready for Transformational Growth
for Your Business?

Request a Free Consultation
An AI-First &
Top Rated Agency
Google ★★★★★ 4.9 / 5
Trust Pilot ★★★★★ 4.8 / 5
500+ BRANDS SCALED

#1 AI-Enabled Digital Marketing Agency

We turn clicks into customers through AI + Human Intelligence — delivering measurable, compounding revenue growth for brands across India & the world.

AI-Powered 500+ Brands ⭐ 4.9 Rated
hello@whamply.com +91 76783 01242 New Delhi, India Mon–Sat: 9am – 7pm IST

Find Us


4.9 / 5 rating
Google Reviews
4.8 / 5 rating
Trustpilot
4.7 / 5 rating
Facebook

WHAMPLY MEDIA

Copyright © 2026 Whamply Media®. All rights reserved.

Call Us Email Us WhatsApp
Enquire Now WhatsApp